Coagulopathy in Covid-19 patients an observational institutional study at MGMMC, Indore

Introduction- Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19), first identified in Wuhan, China in December of 2019, has become a worldwide pandemic. It was declared by (WHO) World health organization as Public health emergency on 30th January 2020. Although respiratory compromise is the cardinal feature of the disease, early studies have suggested that elevated circulating D-dimer levels are associated with mortality, 1, 2 suggesting a distinct coagulation disorder associated with COVID-19 Materials And Methods- All patients aged ≥18 years with confirmed COVID-19 (defined as a positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction test by nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab or sputum specimen) were included in the study. The incidence of bleeding and thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients was assessed. Pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were confirmed radiographically. Results of 6 routinely drawn coagulation-based laboratory parameters (PT, international normalized ratio [INR], activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT], D-dimer, fibrinogen, and platelet count), 2 laboratory measures of inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP], and erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]), were evaluated and compared between patients with thrombotic complications (composite of venous thromboembolism, arterial thromboembolism, and clinically significant non-vessel thrombotic complications), patients with bleeding complications, and patients without bleeding or thrombotic complications. Result- In this study, we report the haemostatic manifestations and bleeding and thrombotic complications of 100 COVID-19 patients. In a population managed with standard doses of prophylactic anticoagulation, we found a radiographically confirmed venous thromboembolic rate of 4.8% (7.6% in critically ill patients) Conclusion- In conclusion, we observed that COVID-19 was associated with similar rates of thrombosis and bleeding as seen in hospitalized patients with similar degrees of critical illness. Elevated D-dimer levels at initial presentation predicted bleeding complications, thrombotic complications, critical illness, and death. Beyond D-dimer, thrombosis was primarily associated with inflammatory markers rather than coagulation parameters. We additionally found that elevations in D-dimer on admission predicted critical illness and death, as well as bleeding and thrombotic complications. Inflammatory markers, including CRP and ESR, were also associated with thrombosis. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research (Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research) is the property of Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Multi-organ ultrasound for SARS-COV-2 disease

Aim: There is growing evidence regarding the imaging ultrasound findings of coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19. Multi-organ ultrasound has played a significant role in the diagnosis and follow-up of these patients. The aim of this study was to describe the ultrasound findings at pulmonary, cardiac and deep venous system of the lower extremities in patients with SARS-COV-2 infection. Material and method: Prospective, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in patients with confirmed COVID-19 who underwent a multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) examination during hospitalization. Results: A total of 107 patients were enrolled. Lung involvement was present in 100% of the patients, 93.4% bilaterally involvement. The most affected lung area was the posteroinferior (94.39%) followed by the lateral (89.72%). Subpleural consolidations were present in 71% of patients and consolidations larger than 1 cm in 25%. More echographic lung involvement is relational with the degree of respiratory insufficiency. Only two patients had proximal deep vein thrombosis in the lower extremities, 27 angiography tomography scan were performed and pulmonary thromboembolism was confirmed in 14 patients. The most frequent echocardiographic findings were impaired left ventricular relaxation and left ventricular hypertrophy. All patients with thromboembolic disease had severe or critical echocardiographic pulmonary involvement. Conclusions: Multi-organ POCUS ultrasound may be useful for the manifestations of COVID-19. The degree of lung ultrasound involvement was related to the degree of respiratory failure and to the presence of VTED. The relationship between DVT and PTE was lower than expected. Cardiac involvement has little relevance in our series.

Has Lockdown and COVID-19 Led to a Change in the Characteristics of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Patients Who Are Afflicted With It?

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence identifying coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a significant risk factor for thrombosis in inpatients. However, it remains uncertain if patients in the community have been influenced during the COVID-19 pandemic and national lockdown. This study, across four centres in the United Kingdom (UK), reviewed outpatients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). AIM: This study aims to find out whether lockdown and COVID-19 led to a change in the characteristics of DVT and patients who are afflicted with it, alongside a review of DVT service. METHODS: Data was collected retrospectively from electronic patient records system for the following periods: April 1 to June 30, 2019, and April 1 to June 30, 2020. These were the key months during the first national lockdown in UK. Data were analysed for patient demographics, risk factors, characteristics of DVT, management, and DVT reoccurrence. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8 (Dotmatics, Boston, Massachusetts, United States). RESULTS: During the study periods, 227 outpatients from the community sustained DVT in 2019 and 211 in 2020. Of these patients, 13 in 2020 were COVID-19 positive. There was a difference in gender distribution with 128 males and 99 females in 2019, and 93 males and 118 females in 2020 (p= 0.0128). No significant difference was noted in the incidence of thrombophilia with nine in 2019 and three in 2020 (p=0.1437). Fewer long-haul journeys were made in 2020 (only two), compared to 16 in 2019 (p=0.012). Fewer patients had immobility as a risk factor in 2020 (n=55) compared to 2019 (n=79) (p=0.0494). However, there were more patients using oral contraceptive pills, with one in 2019 and nine in 2020 (p=0.0086) . CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in the characteristics, extent, and management of DVT prior to and during the COVID-19 lockdown. National lockdowns do not affect DVT in the community; however, it is important to highlight the surrounding inpatient numbers.

Acquired hemophilia A and deep vein thrombosis attributable to the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine-case report

Background: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare autoimmune bleeding disorder that occurs in a sporadic, nonhereditary pattern. It is caused by circulating autoantibodies against clotting factor VIII that are triggered by several conditions. Moreover, AHA is clinically distinct from the inherited form of hemophilia A, with a different natural history and management approach, necessitating a high-index of suspicion in at-risk patients. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged as a multisystemic disease whose manifestations are continuously being evaluated. There are few case reports of AHA associated with COVID-19 infection, while one case of AHA has been associated with COVID-19 vaccination. Similarly, deep venous thrombosis (DVT) frequently complicates COVID-19 infection, but two cases of DVT have been reported following COVID-19 vaccination. We report the occurrence of both AHA and DVT in a 63-year-old male patient within one week of receiving his first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Case Description: Patient is a 63-year-old male who presented with a 3-day history of left lower extremity (LLE) swelling and pain. He was hemodynamically stable, but examination showed exquisite tenderness, ecchymosis, and pitting edema at the calf of the LLE. He had normal platelet counts at presentation but had mild anemia (11.9 g/dL) and elevated activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) of 68.0 seconds. Venous Doppler ultrasound showed acute DVT in the left popliteal vein, necessitating commencement on heparin drip. He developed progressively worsening hematomas, symptomatic anemia that required red cell transfusions, and persistently elevated APTT despite stopping the heparin drip. Work up for pulmonary embolism, malignancy, and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) were negative. Antiphospholipid antibodies and lupus anticoagulant were also negative. He had low factor VIII levels, tested positive for factor VIII inhibitor, and PTT mixing studies were consistent with acquired factor inhibitor. Treatment involved administration of Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity (FEIBA) as well as intravenous methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide. Following resolution of active bleeding with evidence of stable hemoglobin concentration, he was discharged home on oral prednisone and cyclophosphamide. Conclusion(s): This case report highlights the possibility of AHA and DVT as rare, potentially life-threatening adverse events that could occur following COVID-19 vaccination, which is currently the most effective tool employed in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic.Copyright © Annals of Blood. All rights reserved.

Deep Venous Thrombosis in Elderly Inpatients with Pneumonia

Background: The occurrence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in COVID-19 pneumonia has raised wide concern recently, but few studies have reported the incidence of DVT in other types of pneumonia. We evaluate the prevalence, risk factors and treatment of DVT in the elderly inpatients with pneumonia. Method(s): A cohort of 550 elderly inpatients (>= 75 years old) with pneumonia between 2017 and 2021 were reviewed. They were divided into DVT group and non-DVT groups on the basis of whether pneumonia was combined with new-found DVT. Clinical data were collected retrospectively. Patients with DVT were divided into anticoagulant group and non-anticoagulant groups on the basis of whether they received anticoagulant therapy. Result(s): Ninety-seven patients were included in the DVT group;453 in the non-DVT group. The incidence of DVT was 17.64%. Hospital stays were significantly longer for DVT patients than for non-DVT counterparts (p = 0.005). Coronary heart disease, heart failure, hyperlipidemia, bed rest, and elevated D-dimer were independent risk factors for DVT (p < 0.05). The rate of anticoagulant therapy in DVT group was 63.92% (62/97 cases). Follow-up showed that the continuous anticoagulant treatment rate was 48.39% (30/62 cases) at 3 months and 30.65% (19/62 cases) at 6 months. Conclusion(s): Elderly inpatients with pneumonia are at high risk of DVT. The combination of DVT and pneumonia may lead to prolonged hospitalization. Coronary heart disease, heart failure, hyperlipidemia, bed rest and elevated D-dimer are independent risk factors for DVT in these patients. The rate of regular anticoagulant treatment is low because of the high risk of bleeding.Copyright © 2022, Taiwan Society of Geriatric Emergency & Critical Care Medicine.

High incidence of common femoral Deep Vein Thrombosis in critically ill Covid19 patients.

Objective: To estimate the incidence and prevalence of deep venous thrombosis, and to evaluate the discriminative capacity of D-dimer in its diagnosis. METHODS: The prospective, observational study was conducted at the critical care unit of a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan from February to September 2021 and comprised consecutively admitted adult critically ill patients who were receiving therapeutic-dose anticoagulation therapy. All patients were screened on day one for deep venous thrombosis by colour doppler and compression ultrasonography. Patients who did not have deep venous thrombosis on the first scan were followed every 72 hours. Data was analysed using SPSS 26. RESULTS: Of the 142 patients, 99(69.7%) were male and 43(30.3%) were female. The overall mean age was 53.20+/-13.3 years. On the first scan, 25(17.6%) patients had deep venous thrombosis. Of the remaining 117 patients, 78(68.4%) were followed every 72 hours, and 23(29.48%) of them developed deep venous thrombosis. The most common site for DVT was the common femoral vein 46(95.8%) and most deep venous thrombosis cases were unilateral 28(58.33%). D-dimer levels showed no discriminative capacity for diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (p=0.79). There were no significant risk factors for the development of deep venous thrombosis. Conclusion: There was a high incidence and prevalence of deep venous thrombosis despite therapeutic-dose anticoagulation therapy. The most common affected site was the common femoral vein and most deep venous thrombosis were unilateral. D-dimer levels had no discriminative capacity for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis DVT.

Elective Joint Arthroplasty Should be Delayed by One Month After COVID-19 Infection to Prevent Postoperative Complications.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether a history of recent COVID-19 infection affects the outcomes and risks of complications of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of TJA in patients who have and have not had a recent COVID-19 infection. METHODS: A large national database was queried for patients undergoing total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Patients who had a diagnosis of COVID-19 within 90-days preoperatively were matched to patients who did not have a history of COVID-19 based on age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and procedure. A total of 31,453 patients undergoing TJA were identified, of which 616 (2.0%) had a preoperative diagnosis of COVID-19. Of these, 281 COVID-19 positive patients were matched with 281 patients who did not have COVID-19. The 90-day complications were compared between patients who did and did not have a diagnosis of COVID-19 at 1, 2, and 3 months preoperatively. Multivariate analyses were used to further control for potential confounders. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of the matched cohorts showed that COVID-19 infection within 1 month prior to TJA was associated with an increased rate of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (odds ratio [OR]: 6.50, 95% confidence interval: 1.48-28.45, P = .010) and venous thromboembolic events (odds ratio: 8.32, confidence interval: 2.12-34.84, P = .002). COVID-19 infection within 2 and 3 months prior to TJA did not significantly affect outcomes. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 infection within 1 month prior to TJA significantly increases the risk of postoperative thromboembolic events; however, complication rates returned to baseline after that time point. Surgeons should consider delaying elective total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty until 1 month after a COVID-19 infection.

Screening for asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in COVID-19 patients admitted to the medical ward: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Patients with COVID-19 have an increased risk for venous thrombo-embolism (VTE), especially pulmonary embolism. The exact prevalence of asymptomatic DVT is not known, as is the usefulness of screening for DVT in patients admitted to ward with COVID-19. We have studied the prevalence of asymptomatic DVT. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional observational multi-center study at four university medical centers in The Netherlands. All adult patients admitted with COVID-19 to a medical ward were eligible for inclusion, including patients who were transferred back from the ICU to the ward. The study protocol consisted of weekly cross-sectional rounds of compression ultrasound. RESULTS: In total, 125 patients were included in the study. A significant proportion of patients (N = 34 (27%)) had developed a VTE during their admission for COVID-19 before the study ultrasound was performed. In most VTE cases (N = 27 (79%)) this concerned pulmonary embolism. A new asymptomatic DVT was found in 5 of 125 patients (4.0%; 95% CI 1.3-9.1%) (Table 2). Nine patients (7.2%; 95% CI 3.3-13.2%) developed a VTE (all PE) diagnosed within 28 days after the screening US was performed. CONCLUSION: We have shown a low prevalence (4%) of newly discovered asymptomatic DVT outside the ICU-setting in COVID-19 patients. Despite this low prevalence, nine patients developed PE (7%) within 28 days after ultrasound. This favors the hypothesis of local thrombus formation in the lungs. Based on our findings and literature, we do not recommend US-screening of asymptomatic patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ward.

COVID-19-Induced Phlegmasia Cerulea Dolens.

A 44-year-old male with a history of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) with the inferior vena cava (IVC) filter in place and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) status post lower extremity vascular stenting presented from a COVID-19 rehabilitation center with bilateral phlegmasia cerulea dolens and no palpable popliteal or dorsalis pedis pulses, at risk for venous gangrene and loss of limbs. The patient was anticoagulated and taken emergently to the operating room for vascular surgery where thrombolysis with alteplase and mechanical thrombectomy were performed. Bilateral thrombolysis infusion catheters were placed for two days. The patient had a return of arterial signals in the feet and decreasing clot burden. The patient is expected to make a full recovery.

Efficacy and safety of sonographer discretion to terminate a venous duplex ultrasound for diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in coronavirus disease 2019 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Sonographers performing venous duplex ultrasound (VDUS) of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have an increased risk of exposure owing to their close contact with these patients for an extended period. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of a modified COVID-19 VDUS protocol to reduce sonographer exposure to COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective review. Patients who had undergone VDUS under the modified COVID-19 protocol between March 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020, with a confirmed or presumed COVID-19 diagnosis at the VDUS were included. The modified COVID-19 protocol was defined as the ability of the sonographer to terminate the examination on detection of an acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The primary outcome measures were the number of anatomic deep venous segments recorded by the sonographer, which was used as a surrogate measure for sonographer exposure time, and the number of acute DVTs found on follow-up examinations in segments not visualized at the index VDUS. RESULTS: A total of 160 lower extremity VDUS (LEVDUS) scans and 72 upper extremity VDUS (UEVDUS) scans were performed using the modified COVID-19 protocol. The index VDUS had found an acute DVT for 44 of 160 patients (27.5%) who had undergone LEVDUS and 26 of 72 (36.6%) who had undergone UEVDUS. On follow-up imaging, 7 of 38 LEVDUS scans (17.9%) and 1 of 10 UEVDUS scans (10%) had demonstrated a new acute DVT. Malignancy and surgery 30 days before imaging were significantly associated with acute lower extremity DVT, and mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were associated with acute upper extremity DVT. On the index VDUS, the average was 10.6 of 12 total visualized segments on LEVDUS and 6.4 of 10 total segments on UEVDUS. Of the index VDUS scans, 35.6% of the LEVDUS and 78.6% of the UEVDUS scans had been abbreviated. The index VDUS scans that were positive for acute DVT had had significantly fewer visualized segments for both lower (8.4 vs 11.5; P < .0001) and upper (4.2 vs 7.6) extremities (P < .0001). On the follow-up examinations, only one of eight new acute DVTs had been found in a patient whose index VDUS had been abbreviated and the corresponding segment not assessed. These findings did not affect the patient's clinical course. CONCLUSIONS: The modified COVID-19 VDUS protocol reduced sonographers' potential exposure time to COVID-19. Additionally, the clinical efficacy was maintained, with no missed DVTs, despite the abbreviation of the VDUS examinations.

Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 infection.

To determine if people infected with SARS-CoV-2 were at higher risk of developing selected medical conditions post-recovery, data were extracted from the database of a large health maintenance organization (HMO) in Israel between March 2020 and May 2021. For each condition, a condition-naïve group prior to COVID-19 (PCR-positive) infection were compared to a condition-naïve, non-COVID-19 infected group, matched by gender, age, socioeconomic status, minority group status and number of months visited primary care physician (PCP) in previous year. Diagnosis and recuperation dates for each COVID-19 infected participant were applied to their matched comparison participant (1:1 ratio). Incidence of each condition was measured between date of recuperation and end of study period for each group and Cox regression models developed to determine hazard ratios by group status, controlling for demographic and health variables. Crude and adjusted incidence rates were higher for the COVID-19 infected group than those not infected with COVID-19 for treatment for depression/anxiety, sleep disturbance, diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis, lung disease and fibromyalgia. Differences in incidence were no longer observed between the two groups for treatment of sleep disturbance, and diagnosis of lung disease when those hospitalized during the acute-phase of illness (any reason) were excluded. No difference was found by COVID-19 infection status for post-acute incidence of diabetes, cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, acute kidney disease, hypertension and ischemic heart disease. Patients post-COVID-19 infection should be evaluated for depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, DVT, lung disease and fibromyalgia.

The prevalence of deep vein thrombosis and associated risk factors among patients with COVID-19 in the North of Iran

Aim: We aimed to investigate the associated risk factors of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) among COVID-19 patients. Materials & methods: In this cross-sectional study the demographical data and clinical characteristics of 382 COVID-19 patients were collected and analyzed. Results: The DVT was observed in 53 patients (14.1%). The rate of death was significantly associated with the incidence of DVT, 48.1 versus 32.2% in non-DVT cases;p = 0.034). Also, BMI (p = 0.0001), renal failure (p = 0.001), lower-limb edema (p = 0.0001) and intubation (p = 0.004) were associated with the risk of DVT. Conclusion: COVID-19 patients with a higher BMI, renal failure, lower-limb edema and need for intubation were at a higher risk of DVT.

Post Covid Guillain-Barre Syndrome and pulmonary embolism: A rare combination

We hereby report a case with rare combination of Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and Pulmonary embolism (PE) during post-covid period. A 67-year-old male presented with acute breathlessness and calf pain for seven days. He suffered from COVID-19 four weeks prior. He recovered fully then but was not on prophylactic anticoagulants. His lower limb venous doppler confirmed DVT. CT Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) confirmed PE. His neurological examination revealed bilateral diminished ankle jerks and Babinski flexion reflex, though he had no neurological complaints. Nerve conduction studies revealed acute motor sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN) variant of GBS. He was treated with enoxaparin followed by rivaroxaban for thromboembolism and with intravenous immunoglobulins for GBS, to which he responded well. Early diagnosis of GBS saved him from further morbidity. Post Covid GBS has been rarely reported from India. Concurrence of GBS with DVT and PE is further rare. Copyright © 2023 Ubiquity Press. All rights reserved.

Thromboembolic Diseases Among Intensive Care Unit Patients in Al-Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia.

Background Venous and arterial thrombotic conditions are the two types of thromboembolic events. Main venous thromboembolism (VTE) includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), while arterial thromboses include ischemic stroke and ischemic heart disease (IHD). Aim This study aimed to assess the prevalence of thromboembolic events among intensive care unit (ICU) patients in Al-Qassim region, Saudi Arabia. Patients and methods This is a retrospective chart review of ICU patients diagnosed with thromboembolic disease who were seen at the intensive care unit of King Fahad Specialist Hospital between July 2020 and June 2022. Data were obtained from hospital medical files and gathered into an Excel sheet (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). All data analyses were carried out using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY, USA). Results Of the 38 patients included, 52.6% were males (mean age: 60.7; standard deviation (SD): 23.9). The most common risk factors for thromboembolic events were immobilization (23.7%) and major surgeries (18.4%). The incidence of DVT was 42.1%, while PE was 39.5%. Seven patients were detected with combined incidence (DVT and PE). Mortality rates accounted for 39.5%. It is interesting to note that the prevalence of patients who use heparin treatment was statistically significantly higher among DVT patients (p=0.043). Conclusion The incidence of deep vein thrombosis was 42.1%, while pulmonary embolism occurred in 39.5%. However, 18.4% of the ICU patients had an occurrence of both DVT and PE. Furthermore, immobilization was identified as the most common risk factor for thromboembolic events, followed by major surgeries. More research is necessary to determine the incidence and prevalence of thromboembolic disease and its manifestations.

Standard dosing of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in critically ill patient with COVID-19: a multicenter propensity-score matched study.

BACKGROUND: Thrombotic events are common in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and have been linked with COVID-19- induced hyperinflammatory state. In addition to anticoagulant effects, heparin and its derivatives have various anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties that may affect patient outcomes. This study compared the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic standard-doses of enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) in critically ill patients with COVID-19.  METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study included critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU between March 2020 and July 2021. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the type of pharmacological VTE thromboprophylaxis given in fixed doses (Enoxaparin 40 mg SQ every 24 hours versus UFH 5000 Units SQ every 8 hours) throughout their ICU stay. The primary endpoint was all cases of thrombosis. Other endpoints were considered secondary. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to match patients (1:1 ratio) between the two groups based on the predefined criteria. Multivariable logistic, Cox proportional hazards, and negative binomial regression analysis were used as appropriate.  RESULTS: A total of 306 patients were eligible based on the eligibility criteria; 130 patients were included after PS matching (1:1 ratio). Patients who received UFH compared to enoxaparin had higher all thrombosis events at crude analysis (18.3% vs. 4.6%; p-value = 0.02 as well in logistic regression analysis (OR: 4.10 (1.05, 15.93); p-value = 0.04). Although there were no significant differences in all bleeding cases and major bleeding between the two groups (OR: 0.40 (0.07, 2.29); p-value = 0.31 and OR: 1.10 (0.14, 8.56); p-value = 0.93, respectively); however, blood transfusion requirement was higher in the UFH group but did not reach statistical significance (OR: 2.98 (0.85, 10.39); p-value = 0.09). The 30-day and in-hospital mortality were similar between the two groups at Cox hazards regression analysis. In contrast, hospital LOS was longer in the UFH group; however, it did not reach the statistically significant difference (beta coefficient: 0.22; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.48; p-value = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic enoxaparin use in critically ill patients with COVID-19 may significantly reduce all thrombosis cases with similar bleeding risk compared to UFH.

Thrombosis and lymphocyte subsets of COVID-19 omicron BA.2 variant patients with cancer.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused an ongoing global pandemic of COVID-19. It has been found that COVID-19 has an influence on the changes of blood coagulation parameters and the high incidence of thrombosis. Changchun experienced the epidemic of the Omicron BA.2 variant SARS-CoV-2 in March 2022 in China. Once infected, BA.2 spreads rapidly and most of them are asymptomatic. The purpose of this study is to research venous thrombosis and laboratory changes (including PLT, PT, APTT, DD, FDP, CRP, WBC, IL-6 and lymphocyte subsets) among 92 cancer patients with COVID-19 and 73 COVID-19 patients with non-cancer by Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square test. It was found that the levels of D-dimer, FDP, CRP and IL-6 in cancer patients were significantly higher than those in the COVID-19 cohort. There were 9 (9.8%) cancer patients and 2 (2.7%) non-cancer patients found VTE, with no significant difference. The results showed that WBC, lymphocytes and B cells in cancer patients were significantly lower than those in the other group. Prophylactic anticoagulation was recommended for cancer patients with high risk factors, while paying attention to the occurrence of bleeding events. The detection of leukocyte classification, D-dimer, prothrombin time and fibrinogen at different time points are helpful for the diagnosis and anticoagulation of COVID-19 patients with cancer.

A Case of Deep Vein Thrombosis After Recovery From COVID-19 and Its Association With Elevated D-dimers.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to be a devastating disease for the elderly population, especially in long-term care facilities, and it presents with varying clinical presentations. We have ample evidence that COVID-19 can predispose to deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) during an active infection. Still, very few cases of DVT have been reported after recovery from COVID-19. The imbalance of the coagulation cascade and the increased release of certain coagulation factors play an essential role in promoting hypercoagulability and vascular endothelial dysfunction. It leads to a rise in the level of fibrin degradation products, D-dimers, which can remain elevated for up to several weeks, even after recovery. It has been suggested that the risk of DVT occurring after recovering from COVID-19 remains high for up to three months. We report a case of a 77-year-old long-term care female resident at a nursing facility, ambulatory at baseline, who was noted to be COVID-19 positive upon routine facility-wide testing per department of health guidelines. She was asymptomatic during her 10-day quarantine period. D-dimer levels during routine labs were high (initial D-dimer level of 1.87 mg/L FEU {normal value: 0.19-0.52 mg/L FEU}), but the patient had no clinical signs and symptoms of DVT. Ultrasound of the bilateral legs was not performed due to low clinical suspicion. The patient received an enoxaparin DVT prophylaxis dose during the quarantine period. Follow-up D-dimer levels were done at frequent intervals after recovery, but D-dimer levels continued to remain elevated up till six weeks after her 10-day quarantine period ended. Based on previous experience with other long-term care residents who suffered from COVID-19, bilateral lower extremity ultrasound was performed, which showed bilateral DVT. Elevated D-dimer levels are a predictor of hypercoagulation complications in COVID-19. Patients with persistently elevated D-dimer levels after recovery from COVID-19 should be screened for thromboembolic complications, even if they are asymptomatic. DVT can occur up to three months post-recovery from COVID-19 infection.

Venous thromboembolism in COVID-19: A meta-summary of cases.

OBJECTIVES: To summarize cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) among coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients and discuss their symptoms, diagnostic method, clinical features, and prognosis. METHODS: All major databases were searched for relevant studies published between December 1, 2019 and May 5, 2021. RESULTS: A total of 233 articles were identified, 22 describing 48 patients were included. A total of 79.1% had PE and 20.9% had DVT. Most patients were men, with a mean age of 56 years. Comorbidities were present in 70.8%, and 85.4% had at least one risk factor of VTE. 56.3% had received anticoagulation therapy. Most patients were treated in the general ward. Complications occurred in 27.1% of the patients, and recovery was achieved in 80.4%. CONCLUSION: Venous thromboembolism must be suspected even in patients who had received prior anticoagulant regimens or in stable cases, especially in males, the elderly, and patients with comorbidities and high D-dimer levels.

A Case of Pulmonary Tuberculosis, Severe Dengue, and COVID-19 With Venous Thromboembolism in an Indian Male: World's First Case.

The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in extensive morbidity and mortality. Not only the viral pandemic has affected almost every single person on this planet directly or indirectly but it has resulted in reporting of several cases with rare presentations of common diseases. The present case is a rare presentation wherein COVID-19 with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), severe dengue, and venous thromboembolism was diagnosed in an Indian male. This case is crucial as no such case has ever been reported in the literature. Also, during the pandemic other diseases received relatively less attention. Therefore, establishing the diagnosis in a situation where the health systems were oversaturated was a difficult task, and thus present case would be an important addition to the literature. Further, diseases like COVID-19, TB, and dengue share many similarities like pathogenesis, clinical features, and lab results, therefore, this case would help the clinicians, especially in settings where these diseases are common.

Oral intake of Kluyveromyces marxianus B0399 plus Lactobacillus rhamnosus CECT 30579 to mitigate symptoms in COVID-19 patients: A randomized open label clinical trial.

At the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, developing of new treatments to control the spread of infection and decrease morbidity and mortality are necessary. This prospective, open-label, case-control intervention study evaluates the impact of the oral intake of the probiotic yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus B0399 together with Lactobacillus rhamnosus CECT 30579, administered for 30 days, on the evolution of COVID-19 patients. Analysis of the digestive symptoms at the end of the follow up shows a benefit of the probiotic in the number of patients without pyrosis (100% vs 33.3%; p 0.05) and without abdominal pain (100% vs 62.5%; p 0.04). Results also show a better evolution when evaluating the difference in the overall number of patients without non-digestive symptoms at the end of the follow-up (41.7%, vs 13%; p 0.06). The percentage of improvement in the digestive symptoms (65% vs 88%; p value 0.06) and the global symptoms (digestive and non-digestive) (88.6% vs 70.8%; p value 0.03) is higher in the probiotic group. The probiotic was well tolerated with no relevant side effects and high adherence among patients. In conclusion, this coadjutant treatment seems to be promising, although results should be confirmed in new studies with higher number of patients.